History in the Future.
Ralf Hugger
What is history? I admit, at first glance that seems to be a strange question. However, please consider the following. On planet earth at any given moment there are trillions, upon trillions of things happening simultaneously, at the same time. These acts and events are interconnected in two dimensions, space and time. Space because they are occurring on planet earth and time because they are only happening in the present moment. There are 7 billion human beings on planet earth today. Who and how do we decide what will be remembered as "history" and what will be forgotten? To begin answering this question, I claim that history is a process of documenting events, experiences and interpretations of meaning. This is done with the use of narratives and discourses which are articulated by the witnesses, culprits and activists of history.
Historicization, is the mode or processes by which content is being documented in time and space. The result is the emergence of narratives, which frame an event in context, assign meaning and explain the connections to the rest of society. I first became aware of this concept when I read Edward Said's "Culture and Imperialism" in graduate school. In this critical analysis, he brings forth the concept of historicization. Edward Said was a scholar of literature and thus his primary focus was on the classic European literature that discussed the experiences of empire and colonization. In "Culture and Imperialism " Edward Said wrote,
"The appropriation of history, the historicization of the past, the narrativization of society, all of which give the novel its force, include the accumulation and differentiation of social space, space to be used for social purposes." (Said, pg. 78 1993)
It recently occurred to me that these processes have been radically transformed by technology beginning with Gutenberg's press all the way to today's smart phones. Before the advent of radio and television, the only ways to capture peoples' experiences were in writing, speaking or other cultural artifacts. Consequently, general analysis of the past is limited to these traditional forms and sources of information. One could argue that the further back in time we look, the fewer sources and information we have available to represent that time. Considering peoples' ability to document today, future historians will have the opportunity to construct more diverse and perhaps more comprehensive accounts of today.
Historicization, is the mode or processes by which content is being documented in time and space. The result is the emergence of narratives, which frame an event in context, assign meaning and explain the connections to the rest of society. I first became aware of this concept when I read Edward Said's "Culture and Imperialism" in graduate school. In this critical analysis, he brings forth the concept of historicization. Edward Said was a scholar of literature and thus his primary focus was on the classic European literature that discussed the experiences of empire and colonization. In "Culture and Imperialism " Edward Said wrote,
"The appropriation of history, the historicization of the past, the narrativization of society, all of which give the novel its force, include the accumulation and differentiation of social space, space to be used for social purposes." (Said, pg. 78 1993)
It recently occurred to me that these processes have been radically transformed by technology beginning with Gutenberg's press all the way to today's smart phones. Before the advent of radio and television, the only ways to capture peoples' experiences were in writing, speaking or other cultural artifacts. Consequently, general analysis of the past is limited to these traditional forms and sources of information. One could argue that the further back in time we look, the fewer sources and information we have available to represent that time. Considering peoples' ability to document today, future historians will have the opportunity to construct more diverse and perhaps more comprehensive accounts of today.
Consider what it was like to live in the year 1729? The only accounts we have from this time are either written, verbal or cultural artifacts such as theater and music etc...The emergence of modern audio, film, Internet and mobile technology will allow historical analysis of the future to expand on traditional methodologies. Technology is renegotiating the notion of what a legitimate or authentic historical source is. For example, recall the film footage of the Allied Forces liberating Nazi concentration camps at the end of World War II. The footage helped to comprehend, process and, in the end, prosecute Nazi Germany. Even today the footage stands as a chilling testimony as well as historical artifact to the terrors of the Third Reich. The act of seeing and hearing the horrors first hand, with your own eyes and ears, helps to put the unimaginable into context and maintain a record or remembrance to urge the lessons learned. The contemporary digital, mobil and electronic computing revolution has led to information duplication and dissemination like never before. It highlights the importance of technology when societies relate to historical events.
As a hyper documented species today, we can witness how the power and ability to preserve and spread information that will shapes our reality of tomorrow. The ability to communicate and document information is so powerful and important because it provides opportunity to express one's individual as well as collective perspectives. In all artifacts we can find historical discourses that create meaning, identity or actions. The study of modern history is at a point at which understanding historical events as comprehensively as possible will most likely mean the analysis of vast pools of data and content. Going forward, it is conceivable that the discipline of history has to renegotiate what a comprehensive analysis of an historical event could entail. Content recorded in the here and now represents a vast pool of data capturing a particular moment during in a particular space. A sample can be vast, quantitative as well as qualitative in nature. Just because of the shear size of a sample the investigation of history will be in need of a new kind of digital anthropology and archeology. A future discipline born to the marriage of historical inquisition and contextualization of archived, digital data. The content captured today, will be a multi media, digital "mosaic" of synthesized information and perspectives for the people of tomorrow.
Ralf Hugger